Abstract
In 2010, a report on EU member state military higher education concluded that “[t]here is no common understanding between the Member States about how the education of a young officer should be organized or what competences he or she should have” (Paile, 2010, p. 11). Similarly, Syme-Taylor and Jalili describe the field as “somewhat ill-defined; an heterogenous collection of diverse articles with discernible thematic linkages, rather than a unified literary tradition with consistent conventions and a self-referential process of evolution” (2018, pp. 98–99). A survey of this field is therefore timely. This article is the first scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature in English on professional military education (PME) in the twenty-first century. Following the conventions of scoping reviews we describe the characteristics of the peer-reviewed literature on PME, identify its main thematic concerns, and pinpoint some gaps in the literature that can inspire and guide further research.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Enstad, K., & Hagen, A. M. (2026). No common understanding? A scoping review of professional military education in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 70(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2459408
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.