Institutional and policy bottlenecks to IPM

19Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper summarises institutional and policy bottlenecks to IPM in Africa. Agricultural policy in Africa generally prioritises production and productivity above environmental sustainability, so the use of synthetic pesticides for controlling pests is encouraged. Funding for research in IPM is limited, and extension systems struggle to provide the level of farmer support that adoption of IPM often needs. Improved research and extension policies could facilitate uptake of IPM. Public and private food-safety standards can incentivise adoption, but currently this is mainly in production for export. Pesticide and other input regulatory systems unintentionally constrain adoption of IPM, through expensive registration procedures, weak compliance monitoring and limited regional harmonisation. IPM must be seen as a key element of food-system transformation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Day, R., Haggblade, S., Moephuli, S., Mwang’ombe, A., & Nouala, S. (2022, August 1). Institutional and policy bottlenecks to IPM. Current Opinion in Insect Science. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free