Pathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer

160Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some 50 total mesorectal excision specimens were examined following rectal excision for cancer. Circumferential margin involvement was rare, but mesorectal tumour deposits were present in 17 of 44 patients with pT3 tumours, and 23 of 44 had mesorectal nodal involvement. No patient with a pT2 tumour had mesorectal involvement. Failure to excise the mesorectum completely has the potential to leave gross or microscopic residual disease that may in theory predispose to local failure. Total mesorectal excision is necessary to avoid incomplete pathological evaluation of the mesorectum and understaging of rectal cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reynolds, J. V., Joyce, W. P., Dolan, J., Sheahan, K., & Hyland, J. M. (1996). Pathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 83(8), 1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830826

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free