Hurricanes and hashtags: Characterizing online collective attention for natural disasters

8Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study collective attention paid towards hurricanes through the lens of n-grams on Twitter, a social media platform with global reach. Using hurricane name mentions as a proxy for awareness, we find that the exogenous temporal dynamics are remarkably similar across storms, but that overall collective attention varies widely even among storms causing comparable deaths and damage. We construct 'hurricane attention maps' and observe that hurricanes causing deaths on (or economic damage to) the continental United States generate substantially more attention in English language tweets than those that do not. We find that a hurricane's Saffir-Simpson wind scale category assignment is strongly associated with the amount of attention it receives. Higher category storms receive higher proportional increases of attention per proportional increases in number of deaths or dollars of damage, than lower category storms. The most damaging and deadly storms of the 2010s, Hurricanes Harvey and Maria, generated the most attention and were remembered the longest, respectively. On average, a category 5 storm receives 4.6 times more attention than a category 1 storm causing the same number of deaths and economic damage Copyright:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnold, M. V., Dewhurst, D. R., Alshaabi, T., Minot, J. R., Adams, J. L., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2021). Hurricanes and hashtags: Characterizing online collective attention for natural disasters. PLoS ONE, 16(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251762

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free