An exploratory study on the consumers use of medicine in the State of Sarawak, Malaysia

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of a healthcare service relies on the rational use and the tight regulation of evidence-based medicine. By understanding how consumers take their medicines, policy makers were able to make appropriate intervention that caters for the practices and beliefs of the community. This cross-sectional survey study aimed to investigate the knowledge, awareness and behaviour of medicines usage by consumers in Sarawak. Method: A self-administered, paper-based validated questionnaire was distributed to the general public from 1st September to 31st October 2013. A proportionate cluster sampling was conducted, followed by stratified sampling to ensure similar sample size between urban and rural areas. Chi-square test was used to identify any statistically significant differences between urban and rural participants with their preference. Results and Discussion: A total of 442 respondents were recruited where more respondents from rural area (253, 57.2%) were recruited. More than half of the respondents from both urban and rural groups respectively took some forms of medicines (urban: 111, 58.7%; rural: 156; 65.6%), mostly on health supplements (urban: 48, 25.4%; rural: 61, 24.1%). In terms of the place to obtain their medicines, the Sarawak consumers preferred local government hospital or clinic with 128 (67.7%) among urban group and 221 (87.4%) among rural groups. Only half of the respondents in urban group (50.3%) were aware of "Know Your Medicine" campaign and 63.6% in rural group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The knowledge of respondents towards the correct use of medicines was still considered unsatisfactory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ting, C. Y., Lee, K. S., Tan, R. T. H., Ang, W. C., & Ming, L. C. (2016). An exploratory study on the consumers use of medicine in the State of Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 8(4), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2016.4.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free