Efficacy and safety of cytoreductive therapies in patients with essential thrombocythaemia aged >80 years: An interim analysis of the EXELS study

12Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The median age of patients diagnosed with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is 65-70 years but the management of very elderly patients (aged >80 years) with ET has not been well characterized. Objective: This study aimed to document the treatment patterns of very elderly patients with ET in a multinational, real-world setting. Study Design: EXELS (Evaluation of Xagrid Efficacy and Long-term Safety) is a phase IV observational study, designed to monitor the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive therapies in clinical practice. In total, 3,598 high-risk patients with ET were recruited from May 2005 to April 2009, in 13 European countries. Data were collected at registration and every 6 months thereafter for 5 years. This analysis was performed on a data-cut taken approximately 2 years after the last patient was registered. Patients: In total, 395 patients aged >80 years at registration into EXELS were included in the analysis; of these, 42.2 % had experienced a previous thrombohaemorrhagic event. Results: At registration, the most frequently prescribed cytoreductive therapy for patients aged >80 years was hydroxycarbamide (HC), which accounted for 82.8 % of patients whereas anagrelide use was less frequent (8.6 %). Very elderly patients were more likely to be switched from anagrelide than from HC (47.1 vs. 17.4 %; 95 % confidence interval for difference in proportion 12.4-46.9; Chi-squared test p < 0.001). Median platelet count during treatment was ~430 × 109/L. In patients aged >80 years, the main reason for switch was intolerance/side effects (34.1 %); 0/16 patients reported treatment with anagrelide was non-efficacious compared with 8/57 (14 %) patients receiving HC, and 7/16 (43.8 %) anagrelide patients switched because of intolerance versus 18/57 (31.6 %) patients receiving HC. At least one predefined clinical event (PDE) was experienced by 27.3 % of patients aged >80 years. The most common PDEs reported in the very elderly age group were death (non-PDE related; 11.1 %), other cardiovascular symptoms (5.8 %), haematological transformation (3.8 %), congestive heart failure (3.3 %), myocardial infarction and angina (2.8 %), and thromboembolic events (6.3 %). Conclusion: Well-tolerated and effective cytoreductive therapy has been achieved in patients aged >80 years by following individual treatment modalities that appear in agreement with the recent European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered as ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00567502; Protocol No: SPD422-401. © 2012 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiladjian, J. J., Besses, C., Griesshammer, M., Gugliotta, L., Harrison, C., Coll, R., … Birgegård, G. (2013). Efficacy and safety of cytoreductive therapies in patients with essential thrombocythaemia aged >80 years: An interim analysis of the EXELS study. Clinical Drug Investigation, 33(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-012-0042-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free