Emergency department presentations in the Southern District of New Zealand during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic lockdown

12Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To assess changes in presentations to EDs during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in the Southern Region of New Zealand. Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of patients attending EDs in the Southern District Health Board (SDHB), from 1 March to 13 May 2020. We made comparisons with attendances during the same period in 2019. The 2020 study period included ‘pre-lockdown’ (1 March–25 March), ‘level 4 (strict) lockdown’ (26 March–27 April) and ‘level 3 (eased) lockdown’ (28 April–13 May). Results: Patient volumes reduced in all SDHB EDs during levels 4 and 3, mostly representing a loss of low acuity patients (Australasian Triage Scale 3, 4 and 5), although high-acuity presentations also declined. Average patient age increased by 5 years; however, the proportions of sexes and ethnicities did not change. Presentations of cerebrovascular accidents and appendicitis did not change significantly. Trauma, mental health, acute coronary syndrome and infectious respiratory presentations decreased significantly during level 4, and infectious respiratory presentations decreased further in level 3. Conclusions: Within the SDHB, patient volumes reduced during levels 4 and 3 of our lockdown, with reduced low-acuity presentations. High-acuity patient numbers also declined. Trauma, mental health, alcohol-related, infectious respiratory and acute coronary syndrome presentations declined while cerebrovascular accident and appendicitis numbers showed little to no change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen, M. T., Thompson, B. C., Atkinson, B., Fyfe, C. E., Scanlan, M. J., Stephen, R. E., … Dockerty, J. D. (2021). Emergency department presentations in the Southern District of New Zealand during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 33(3), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free