Viral Contagion and Anti-Terrorism: Notes on Medical Emergency, Legality and Diplomacy

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The dominant imagery in current international relations seems to betray the emergence of an imperialist imaginary that differs markedly from an earlier one. This paper traces the main outlines of this emerging imaginary that has left notions of Empire as spheres of integrative production firmly behind, and is now geared towards imagining Empire as a complete, organic body of free-but-organic-and-therefore-orderly flows that however needs to be kept intact by means of epidemiological interventions aimed at excluding or neutralizing viral entities. Dealing with terrorism, or invading states that allegedly breed them, in this imaginary, is first and foremost a matter of medical necessity and urgency. The legal and diplomatic 'logic' of UN resolutions (Resolution 1441 for example), in this imaginary space, can only be imagined as being of secondary importance. Cooperation and `cosmopolitan' negotiation, as alternatives, disappear in this imaginary that projects an imperialist globalism of epidemiological purity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lippens, R. (2004). Viral Contagion and Anti-Terrorism: Notes on Medical Emergency, Legality and Diplomacy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 17(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SELA.0000033617.97749.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free