A Comparative Evaluation of Threshold Segmentation and LiDAR for Sawmill Residue Volume Estimation

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The sawn timber production process generates up to 63% of residues during primary processing in sawmills. For this industry, the devaluation and disposal of these residues remain significant challenges; proper management requires a more accurate quantification of the volume. This study evaluates and compares two indirect methods for estimating the volume of stacked residues: one based on image processing and the other on terrestrial LiDAR technology. Residues of Pinus spp. from a sawmill were used, with their actual volume determined using a xylometer. The image-based method, which uses threshold-based segmentation, achieved a R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 0.006 m3. In contrast, the LiDAR-based method, which derives measurements directly from 3D reconstruction, obtained an R2 = 0.506 and RMSE = 0.009 m3. Despite these differences, ANOVA testing (p > 0.05) indicated no statistically significant differences between the methods. The results suggest that both approaches may serve as preliminary tools for forest residue quantification and provide a solid foundation for future research aimed at developing field-applicable technological solutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borrego-Núñez, C., García-Quezada, J. de D., Vásquez-Ibarra, L., López-Serrano, P. M., Domínguez-Calleros, P. A., Carrillo-Parra, A., & Compeán-Aguirre, J. L. (2025). A Comparative Evaluation of Threshold Segmentation and LiDAR for Sawmill Residue Volume Estimation. Forests, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/f16071045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free