Development of a dynamics-based model for analyzing strategic water-environmental conflicts: systems thinking instead of linear thinking

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A new evolution in graph modeling for conflict resolution (GMCR), a robust methodology for conflict resolution, is presented in this research to incorporate the systems thinking concept into the conventional paradigm of GMCR so that the dynamic nature of water-environmental conflicts can be modeled, and better outcomes obtained. To achieve this objective, a methodology is developed in three phases: static, dynamic, and outcome-based analyses. To develop the methodology, the Tigris-Euphrates basin conflict in the Middle East over the past 30 years, as a real-life case study, is used to show the robustness and capabilities of the proposed approach. Finally, a sustainable resolution to the current conflict is proposed, and the results are discussed. The proposed methodology benefits from improving the existing and often static-based conflict resolution developments by considering the dynamic nature so that the true root causes of complex conflicts are addressed, better strategic insights achieved, and comprehensive resolution provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shahbaznezhadfard, M., & Yousefi, S. (2022). Development of a dynamics-based model for analyzing strategic water-environmental conflicts: systems thinking instead of linear thinking. Water Policy, 24(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.2166/WP.2021.145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free