Association of low blood pressure with anxiety and depression: The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study

135Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Low blood pressure has mainly been regarded as ideal, but recent studies have indicated an association with depression in elderly people. Objective: To investigate whether low blood pressure is associated with anxiety and depression in the general population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Participants in the population-based Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT-2, 1995-7), Norway. Participants: 60 799 men ana women aged 20-89 years filled in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as part of a general health study. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was classified in age-stratified and sex-stratified centile groups. Main results: Compared with participants with systolic blood pressure within the 41-60 centile (reference) group, the odds ratio for anxiety was 1.31 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16 to 1.49), for depression 1.22 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.46), and for comorbid anxiety and depression 1.44 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.68) in the group with ≤ 5 centile systolic blood pressure. Slightly weaker associations were found of low diastolic blood pressure with anxiety and depression. These associations were similar across sex and age groups. Physical impairment, smoking and angina pectoris influenced the associations only marginally, whereas stroke, myocardial infarction, use of drugs for hypertension, body mass index and several other covariates had no influence. Conclusions: This study represents epidemiological evidence for an association of low blood pressure with anxiety and depression, which is not caused by cardiovascular disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hildrum, B., Mykletun, A., Stordal, E., Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., & Holmen, J. (2007). Association of low blood pressure with anxiety and depression: The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.044966

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free