Virtue ethics – an old answer to a new dilemma? Part 2. The case for inclusive virtue ethics

9Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While Principlism is a widely accepted consensus statement for ethics, the moral theory that underpins it faces serious challenges. This two-part paper proposes a version of virtue theory as a more grounded system of moral analysis. Part 2 examines the role of basic moral theory as the foundation to ethics and suggests how virtue theory can be used as a central framework for ethics while being inclusive of insights from deontology and consequentialism.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Misselbrook, D. (2015). Virtue ethics – an old answer to a new dilemma? Part 2. The case for inclusive virtue ethics. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 108(3), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076814566161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free