Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods for Fraud Detection in Online Credit Card Payments

5Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study explores the application of anomaly detection (AD) methods in imbalanced learning tasks, focusing on fraud detection using real online credit card payment data. We assess the performance of several recent AD methods and compare their effectiveness against standard supervised learning methods. Offering evidence of distribution shift within our dataset, we analyze its impact on the tested models’ performances. Our findings reveal that LightGBM exhibits significantly superior performance across all evaluated metrics but suffers more from distribution shifts than AD methods. Furthermore, our investigation reveals that LightGBM also captures the majority of frauds detected by AD methods. This observation challenges the potential benefits of ensemble methods to combine supervised, and AD approaches to enhance performance. In summary, this research provides practical insights into the utility of these techniques in real-world scenarios, showing LightGBM’s superiority in fraud detection while highlighting challenges related to distribution shifts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thimonier, H., Popineau, F., Rimmel, A., Doan, B. L., & Daniel, F. (2024). Comparative Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods for Fraud Detection in Online Credit Card Payments. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 1011 LNNS, pp. 37–50). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4581-4_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free