Compared jurisprudence on abortion: When feminisms pervade the law

Abstract

I critically analyze the abortion jurisprudence of the United States Court, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the Mexican Supreme Court and the Colombian Supreme Court. I investigate conflicts of Law that structure these pronouncements, along with the legal institutions on which responses to these conflicts are based, and continuities and ruptures of the recognition of the right to abortion. I am interested in feminist contributions included in sentences, as well as in the feminist production of the arguments that allow the abandonment of punitivism on pregnancy interruption and structure the recognition of this expression of sexual autonomy.