A QALY is [still] a QALY is [still] a QALY?: Evaluating proportional shortfall as the answer to the problem of equity in healthcare allocations

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite clinical evidence of drug superiority, therapeutic modalities, like combination immunotherapy, are mostly considered cost-ineffective due to their high costs per life year(s) gained. This paper, taking an ethical stand, reevaluates the standard cost-effectiveness analysis with that of the more recent justice-enhanced methods and concludes by pointing out the shortcomings of the current methodologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahdiani, H., Münch, N., & Paul, N. W. (2024, December 1). A QALY is [still] a QALY is [still] a QALY?: Evaluating proportional shortfall as the answer to the problem of equity in healthcare allocations. BMC Medical Ethics. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01036-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free