Do PFAS changes in landfill leachate treatment systems correlate with changes in physical chemical parameters?

22Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been found at relatively elevated concentrations in landfill leachates. Some landfill facilities treat physical-chemical parameters of their leachates using on-site leachate treatment systems before discharge. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether changes in physical-chemical parameters of leachate at on-site treatment systems (including bulk measurements, oxygen demanding components, and metals) were associated with concentration changes in PFAS. Leachates were evaluated at 15 on-site treatment facilities which included pond systems, aeration tanks, powdered activated carbon (PAC), sand filtration, reverse osmosis (RO) and combination treatment processes. Results show that most physical-chemical parameters and PFAS were significantly reduced in RO systems (over 90 %). For pond systems, statistically significant correlations (rs > 0.6, p < 0.05) were observed between ∑26PFAS changes and the changes in pH, alkalinity, ammonia, and some metals. Significant correlations were also found between ∑8PFAAs precursors changes and specific conductivity (SPC), pH, alkalinity, ammonia, and metals changes. For aeration tank systems, significant correlations (rs > 0.6, p < 0.05) were observed between ∑26PFAS changes and changes in total dissolved solids and zinc, and between the changes of ∑8PFAAs precursors and field pH. These correlations are believed to be associated with rainfall dilution and precipitation of calcium carbonate and other metals as leachate is introduced to the atmosphere.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Bowden, J. A., Townsend, T. G., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M. (2022). Do PFAS changes in landfill leachate treatment systems correlate with changes in physical chemical parameters? Waste Management, 151, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free