Geometric Parameter Optimization of 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays Based on Comprehensive Mechanical Testing and Failure Analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study provides a systematic mechanical characterization and manufacturing analysis of stereolithography-printed microneedle arrays across six geometric designs (300–400 μm diameter and three aspect ratios: 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1) and three array configurations (1 × 1, 5 × 5, 10 × 10). Compression testing to 50 N revealed geometry-dependent optimization: low-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 1, 4, 5) exhibited superior performance in high-density arrays (10 × 10), while high-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 2, 3) performed better as single needles. Manufacturing success rates increased significantly with array density: from 44.2% (95% CI: 41.1–47.3%) for single needles to 67.3% (95% CI: 63.2–71.4%) for 10 × 10 arrays, with 400 μm diameter designs showing higher reliability. Two-way ANOVA confirmed significant effects of both geometric design [F(5, 72) = 145.3, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.91] and array configuration [F(2, 72) = 78.2, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.68] on compressive displacement. Design 5 (400 μm diameter, 3:1 aspect ratio) in a 10 × 10 format exhibited optimal mechanical characteristics, including controlled displacement (0.578 ± 0.036 mm), a high safety factor (SF = 13.32), and a superior manufacturing yield. These findings provide quantitative design guidelines for optimizing 3D-printed microneedle arrays.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aldawood, F. K., & Abualkhair, H. F. (2025). Geometric Parameter Optimization of 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays Based on Comprehensive Mechanical Testing and Failure Analysis. Micromachines, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121377

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free