GC-MS profiling of urinary organic acids evaluated as a quantitative method

69Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We assessed the quantitative performances of a classical method for profiling urinary organic acids: ethyl acetate extraction/oxime- trimethylsilyl derivatization/GC-MS. Twenty-seven acids were quantified on the basis of specific ions in both scan and selected-ion monitoring modes. We found that the tuning of the mass detector severely affects the calibration factors, being critical to achieve quantitative results, and we propose a practical procedure for reproducible tuning. Of seven compounds tested, tropic acid was retained as the internal standard suitable for most of the acids of clinical interest; a second internal standard, 2-ketocaproic acid, was used in quantifying keto-acids. The within-day and total relative standard deviations (CVs), estimated from scan-mode analyses of urine, ranged from 2.6% to 12.7% and from 4.2% to 11.8%, respectively. Curvilinear relationships between analytical response and concentration were observed for most of the acids investigated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duez, P., Kumps, A., & Mardens, Y. (1996). GC-MS profiling of urinary organic acids evaluated as a quantitative method. Clinical Chemistry, 42(10), 1609–1615. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.10.1609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free