Case Study: Assessment of greenhouse gas intensities on exemplary small and mid-sized US dairy farms

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) intensities for 4 dairy farms representing the Northeast, Great Lakes, West, and Southeast US regions using the Farmers Assuring Responsible Management: Environmental Stewardship (FARM ES) life-cycle analysis model. Materials and Methods: Four herds with <1,000 lactating cows, on farms selected as excellent environmental stewards, were assessed, with mean (±SD) production of 10,782 ± 2,037 kg/yr fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). Data from 2021 were gathered from management software, interviews, and on-farm evaluations. Soil OM data for ≥7 yr were available on 3 farms. Emissions intensity was quantified as net CO2 equivalents (CO2e) emitted per unit of FPCM sold. Results and Discussion: Mean (±SD) GHG emissions intensity was 0.97 ± 0.16 kg of CO2e/kg of FPCM. In terms of point sources, FARM ES attributed 42 ± 6% of the farms’ emissions to enteric methane and 28 ± 9% to manure emissions. The remaining emissions were associated with feed production and energy use. Two farms that used manure separation had an average emissions intensity 0.20 kg of CO2e/kg of FPCM less than farms that did not. Average annual soil carbon sequestration rates ranged from −0.82 to 3.52 Mg of carbon/ha, decreasing mean net GHG emissions intensity by 18% on these farms (0.81 vs. 0.99 kg of CO2e/kg of FPCM). Implications and Applications: Management practices have wide-ranging implications for dairy farm emissions intensities, and quantifying soil carbon sequestration is key for estimating net GHG emissions for a dairy farm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olthof, L. A., Briggs, K. R., Knapp, J. R., & Bradford, B. J. (2025). Case Study: Assessment of greenhouse gas intensities on exemplary small and mid-sized US dairy farms. Applied Animal Science, 41(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2024-02624

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free