COMPANY OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE IN LEVERAGE CONTROL AS OPTIMIZATION OF FINANCIAL FRAUD SUPERVISION: A BOARD OF DIRECTORS OUTLOOK

1Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

High leverage will cost the company to achieve its given targets. So, the target that is not completed will make the management meet the target by various ways, namely by financial fraud. This study aims to identify the effect of ownership structure on leverage and financial fraud. The ownership structure in this study stands for foreign, managerial, and institutional ownership. Leverage is used with debt to total asset proxies, while financial fraud uses the categorization of 0 for a non-manipulator, and 1 for a manipulator with a Beneish M-score model. This research uses manufacturing companies registered in Bursa Efek Indonesia for 2016–2020. The sample used was 40 companies with 200 observational data. The method used is purposive sampling, and SPSS software is used to analyze the data with linear regression models and path analysis. The findings showed that foreign ownership did not significantly affect leverage. Managerial and institutional ownership had a significant effect on leverage. In contrast, indirect leverage did not mediate foreign and institutional ownership against financial fraud and mediated significantly between managerial ownership and financial fraud.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Utomo, S. T., & Mawardi, W. (2024). COMPANY OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE IN LEVERAGE CONTROL AS OPTIMIZATION OF FINANCIAL FRAUD SUPERVISION: A BOARD OF DIRECTORS OUTLOOK. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 20(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv20i3art7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free