Abstract
Twenty‐eight nursing staff members treated, by operant methods, a simulated headbanging patient. They were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions, involving improvement versus non‐improvement of the “patient” and promise of reward versus no promise of reward. The promise of reward significantly improved accuracy of treatment. Improvement of the patient, however, did not improve accuracy.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Loeber, R. (1971). ENGINEERING THE BEHAVIORAL ENGINEER 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-321
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free