Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the remnant cement in the subgingival regions (RCS) of abutments fabricated with different CAD/CAM parameters, including margin curvature radius, convergence angle, top fillet radius, and subgingival abutment shape. Methods: Twelve experimental groups were fabricated to test the following parameters: abutment margin curvature radii of 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.6 mm; convergence angles of 4°, 8°, and 12°; top fillet radii of 0.6 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.4 mm; and subgingival abutment shapes of straight, S-curve, and concave. A constant amount of cement was injected into each crown. Vertical and continuous loads were applied to each specimen using a universal machine. RCS values were measured using a 3D intraoral scanner and an analytical balance. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc Tukey test (α = .05). Results: Regarding margin curvature radius, RCS values were significantly higher in the order of 1.6 mm, 1.2 mm, and 0.8 mm (P < 0.001). For convergence angle, higher RCS values were observed at 12° > 8° > 4°(P < 0.001). Among subgingival abutment shapes, concave yielded the highest RCS values, followed by S-curve and straight (P < 0.001). No significant differences in RCS values were found among the groups with different top fillet radii (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, a smaller margin curvature radius, smaller convergence angle, and straight subgingival shape were associated with reduced RCS length, surface area, and weight.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ji, F., Min, J. H., Hwiseong, O., Lee, K. S., Lee, J., Ryu, J. J., & Shim, J. S. (2026). Effects of implant abutment CAD/CAM design parameters on subgingival remnant cement. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 70(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00304
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.