An optimized approach to study endocannabinoid signaling: Evidence against constitutive activity of rat brain adenosine A 1 and cannabinoid CB 1 receptors

106Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. At nanomolar concentrations, SR141716 and AM251 act as specific and selective antagonists of the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor. In the micromolar range, these compounds were shown to inhibit basal G-protein activity, and this is often interpreted to implicate constitutive activity of the CB 1 receptors in native tissue. We show here, using [ 35S]GTPγS binding techniques, that micromolar concentrations of SR141716 and AM251 inhibit basal G-protein activity in rat cerebellar membranes, but only in conditions where tonic adenosine A 1 receptor signaling is not eliminated. 2. Unlike lipophilic A 1 receptor antagonists (potency order DPCPX ≫ N-0840 ≈cirsimarin>caffeine), adenosine deaminase (ADA) was not fully capable in eliminating basal A 1 receptor-dependent G-protein activity. Importantly, all antagonists reduced basal signal to the same extent (20%), and the response evoked by the inverse agonist DPCPX was not reversed by the neutral antagonist N-0840. These data indicate that rat brain A 1 receptors are not constitutively active, but that an ADA-resistant adenosine pool is responsible for tonic A 1 receptor activity in brain membranes. 3. SR141716 and AM251, at concentrations fully effective in reversing CB 1-mediated responses (10 -6 M), did not reduce basal G-protein activity, indicating that CB 1 receptors are not constitutively active in these preparations. 4. At higher concentrations (1-2.5 x 10 -5 M), both antagonists reduced basal G-protein activity in control and ADA-treated membranes, but had no effect when A 1 receptor signaling was blocked with DPCPX. Moreover, the CB 1 antagonists right-shifted A 1 agonist dose-response curves without affecting maximal responses, suggesting competitive mode of antagonist action. The CB 1 antagonists did not affect muscarinic acetylcholine or GABA B receptor signaling. 5. When further optimizing G-protein activation assay for the labile endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), we show, by using HPLC, that pretreatment of cerebellar membranes with methyl arachidonoyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) fully prevented enzymatic degradation of 2-AG and concomitantly enhanced the potency of 2-AG. In contrast to previous claims, MAFP exhibited no antagonist activity at the CB 1 receptor. 6. The findings establish an optimized method with improved signal-to-noise ratio to assess endocannabinoid-dependent G-protein activity in brain membranes, under assay conditions where basal adenosinergic tone and enzymatic degradation of 2-AG are fully eliminated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Savinainen, J. R., Saario, S. M., Niemi, R., Järvinen, T., & Laitinen, J. T. (2003). An optimized approach to study endocannabinoid signaling: Evidence against constitutive activity of rat brain adenosine A 1 and cannabinoid CB 1 receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology, 140(8), 1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705577

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free