Performance of popular pulse oximeters compared with simultaneous arterial oxygen saturation or clinical-grade pulse oximetry: A cross-sectional validation study in intensive care patients

26Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the performance of direct-to-consumer pulse oximeters under clinical conditions, with arterial blood gas measurement (SaO 2) as reference standard. Design Cross-sectional, validation study. Setting Intensive care. Participants Adult patients requiring SaO2-monitoring. Interventions The studied oximeters are top-selling in Europe/USA (AFAC FS10D, AGPTEK FS10C, ANAPULSE ANP 100, Cocobear, Contec CMS50D1, HYLOGY MD-H37, Mommed YM101, PRCMISEMED F4PRO, PULOX PO-200 and Zacurate Pro Series 500 DL). Directly after collection of a SaO2 blood sample, we obtained pulse oximeter readings (SpO2). SpO2-readings were performed in rotating order, blinded for SaO2 and completed <10 min after blood sample collection. Outcome measures Bias (SpO2-SaO2) mean, root mean square difference (A RMS), mean absolute error (MAE) and accuracy in identifying hypoxaemia (SaO2 ≤90%). As a clinical index test, we included a hospital-grade SpO2-monitor (Philips). Results In 35 consecutive patients, we obtained 2258 SpO2-readings and 234 SaO2-samples. Mean bias ranged from-0.6 to-4.8. None of the pulse oximeters met A RMS ≤3%, the requirement set by International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)-standards and required for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 501(k)-clearance. The MAE ranged from 2.3 to 5.1, and five out of ten pulse oximeters met the requirement of ≤3%. For hypoxaemia, negative predictive values were 98%-99%. Positive predictive values ranged from 11% to 30%. Highest accuracy (95% CI) was found for Contec CMS50D1; 91% (86-94) and Zacurate Pro Series 500 DL; 90% (85-94). The hospital-grade SpO2-monitor had an A RMS of 3.0% and MAE of 1.9, and an accuracy of 95% (91%-97%). Conclusion Top-selling, direct-to-consumer pulse oximeters can accurately rule out hypoxaemia, but do not meet ISO-standards required for FDA-clearance

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harskamp, R. E., Bekker, L., Himmelreich, J. C. L., De Clercq, L., Karregat, E. P. M., Sleeswijk, M. E., & Lucassen, W. A. M. (2021). Performance of popular pulse oximeters compared with simultaneous arterial oxygen saturation or clinical-grade pulse oximetry: A cross-sectional validation study in intensive care patients. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000939

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free