A Comparative Study of Reference Reliability in Multiple Language Editions of Wikipedia

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Information presented in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to reliable published sources in the form of references. This study examines over 5 million Wikipedia articles to assess the reliability of references in multiple language editions. We quantify the cross-lingual patterns of the perennial sources list, a collection of reliability labels for web domains identified and collaboratively agreed upon by Wikipedia editors. We discover that some sources (or web domains) deemed untrustworthy in one language (i.e., English) continue to appear in articles in other languages. This trend is especially evident with sources tailored for smaller communities. Furthermore, non-authoritative sources found in the English version of a page tend to persist in other language versions of that page. We finally present a case study on the Chinese, Russian, and Swedish Wikipedias to demonstrate a discrepancy in reference reliability across cultures. Our finding highlights future challenges in coordinating global knowledge on source reliability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baigutanova, A., Saez-Trumper, D., Redi, M., Cha, M., & Aragón, P. (2023). A Comparative Study of Reference Reliability in Multiple Language Editions of Wikipedia. In International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (pp. 3743–3747). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3583780.3615254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free