A Modelling of the Effect of Biomotor Capabilities on the Special Ablitiy Test Course

  • Öncen S
  • Aydın S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate some bio motor capabilities which are thought to have an effect on SpecialAbility Test Course (SATC) test scores applied as an entrance exam in the School of Physical Education and Sports(SPES). 70 participants who were successful in the SATC (51 male (181 ± 5.5 cm, 73.9 ± 9.8 kg) and 19 female (165± 5.6 cm, 54.7 ± 6.49 kg) were included in the study. The bio motor capability performances of the participants, suchas speed (10 m, 20 m, 30 m, 100 m sprint), agility (T-test, 505 agility test), and anaerobic power (Sargent verticaljump test) were measured two weeks after the SATC tests. The performances of the participants in the 2018 SATC ofthe Tekirdag Namik Kemal University SPES were used as the scores of the SATC. The mean of a difference test, acorrelation analysis, and a multiple linear regression analysis were used as the statistical method (p<0,05). Whilethere was a significant positive correlation between the SATC agility (r = 799 **) and speed (r = 895 **) scores,there was a negative correlation between SATC scores and anaerobic power output (r = -719 **). Statistical analysiswas performed by taking the gender factor into account in the linear regression estimation due to the significantdifference (p <0.05) between the SATC scores according to the gender variable. The bio motor capabilities of themale participants, which contributed the most to the SATC scores, were determined as 505 agility (Beta = 424) and30 m (Beta = 379) speed (SATC Male=-9.992 + (10.478 x 505 test) + (6.742 x 30 m). However, the bio motorcapabilities of the female participants did not contribute to the SATC scores.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Öncen, S., & Aydın, S. (2019). A Modelling of the Effect of Biomotor Capabilities on the Special Ablitiy Test Course. World Journal of Education, 9(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n2p103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free