Preservation of Zoological Gardens: Natural vs. Built Features

Abstract

This article showcases zoological garden preservation as a concept caught in a continuing clash of ideals. Zoos are human-made interpretations of one’s expectations and experiences with the natural environment. The dual roles that zoological gardens play, serving as preserves for both nature and culture, creates conflict regarding how to perceive them. It is unclear where the zoo falls in terms of preservation. The decision could be driven by architecture preservation, garden preservation, or animal conservation. The conflict is deepened by differences in values and attitudes regarding zoological gardens. The debate pertaining to the relocation of the only zoo in Kuwait in the Al-Omariya area exemplifies this, with discussions about whether we should regard it as a natural monument or a historic one. In this study, we conducted a questionnaire and an image survey at Al-Omariya residential community using an aesthetic theory approach to measure the residents' levels of attachment to several features of the zoo; to support the argument for or against its removal. We considered the respondents' opinions regarding changes at the zoo, the frequency of their visits there, and their residence proximity. Our findings indicate that there is a stronger level of attachment to the natural features in the zoo than that of the built environment.