Algorithms in Scientific Work: A Qualitative Study of University Research Processes Between Engagement and Critical Reflection

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines the role of algorithms—particularly artificial intelligence—in scientific research processes and how automation intersects with expert knowledge and the autonomy of the researcher. Drawing on 25 qualitative interviews with Italian university scholars in the social sciences and humanities, the research explores how academics either incorporate or resist AI at various stages in their scientific work, the strategies they employ to manage the relationship between professional expertise and algorithmic systems and the forms of trust, caution or scepticism that characterise these interactions. The findings reveal diverse patterns of use, non-use and critical engagement, ranging from instrumental and efficiency-oriented adoption to dialogical experimentation and from identity-based resistance to systemic reflexivity regarding the institutional implications of AI. The study also highlights the need to thoroughly examine the characteristics of disciplinary scientific cultures, while highlighting the importance of promoting algorithmic awareness to support scientific rigour in the digital age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Catone, M. C. (2025). Algorithms in Scientific Work: A Qualitative Study of University Research Processes Between Engagement and Critical Reflection. Societies, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15120349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free