Comparison of nine growth curve models to describe growth of partridges(Alectoris chukar)

Abstract

In this study, nine non linear growth curve models were used to determine the goodness of fit by the body weight measurements of the total number of 178 partridges(Alectoris chukar), 93 females, and 85 males, respectively. The R2(coefficients of determination) values for the total partridges, females and males in Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, von Bertalanffy, asymptote regression,exponential, Monomolecular, Richards and Weibull-type were 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.997, 0.998 and 0.998, 0.996, 0.999 and 0.999, 0.995, 0.995 and 0.996, 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.891, 0.871 and 0.892, 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.997, 0.999 and 0.999, 0.997, 0.999 and 0.999, respectively. The R2 values for Gompertz, Logistic, von Bertalanffy, Richards and Weibull-type were >0.99, while the exponential (<0.90) had the lowest. What’s more, the Gompertz, Logistic, Richards and Weibull-type models best described the data because of lower MSE (mean square error), AIC(Akaike’s information criteria) and BIC(Schwarz Bayesian information criterion), higher adj. R2(Adjusted coefficient of determination) and r(the correlation coefficient between measured body weight and estimated body weight) and there was not an autocorrelation between the residual values. As a result, based on goodness of fit criteria; R2, adj.R2, MSE, r, AIC, BIC values, the Weibull-type model best described live weight data of the Partridges(Alectoris chukar).