Design form classification of two-mirror unobstructed freeform telescopes

  • Trumper I
  • Anderson A
  • Howard J
  • et al.
14Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a general optical design survey of two-mirror unobstructed plane-symmetric freeform (FF) telescopes to provide a standardized framework and reference for further developments in the field of FF optics. We find that there are fundamentally two main design forms: Those that use a positive tilt of the secondary and those that employ a negative rotation to achieve the unobstructed condition. Utilizing this survey, results can be categorized into simple groups of two-mirror unobstructed FF telescopes, analogous to the distinction between a Gregorian-type telescope and Cassegrain-type telescope. Allowing FF surfaces in optical design can enable more compact telescopes while potentially improving the image quality and allowing wider fields of view (FOVs). We define a FF optic as a nonrotationally symmetric mirror or lens, typically with large departures from a best-fit spherical surface (many microns or even millimeters). New manufacturing and testing methods have enabled the production of these types of surfaces. The telescopes we present maintain a 4 â¶ 1 aspect ratio of the FOV and utilize X-Y polynomials for mirror surface description. We impose a plane symmetric constraint on the system and an accessible entrance pupil. We generate charts documenting the relationship between FOV and F/# for the presented optical design forms. We also compare our results to a baseline rotationally symmetric system. These results provide a general method of evaluating baseline designs for two-mirror unobstructed FF telescopes. © 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trumper, I., Anderson, A. Q., Howard, J. M., West, G., & Kim, D. W. (2020). Design form classification of two-mirror unobstructed freeform telescopes. Optical Engineering, 59(02), 1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.59.2.025105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free