Adverse effects of dorsogluteal intramuscular injection versus ventrogluteal intramuscular injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

6Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To determine adverse effects of ventrogluteal intramuscular injections versus dorsogluteal intramuscular injections. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, CENTRAL, LILACS(BVS), BDENF (BVS), WoS, IRCTP(WHO), ClinicalsTrials.gov and PROSPERO databases were searched with no restriction on year or language. Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Results: A total of 1429 participants from 17 studies were included. The meta-analysis found that ventrogluteal injection site had significant relation to lower pain in 9 studies (SMD = −0.63, 95% CI = −0.87, −0.39), bleeding in 4 studies (SMD = −3.46, 95% CI = −6.07, –0.86) and hematoma in 2 studies; after 48 h (SMD = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.39, −0.11), and after 72 h (SMD = −0.16, 95% CI = −0.26, –0.06), if it was compared with dorsogluteal site injection. No differences were found when comparing the possibility of intramuscular injections given into de subcutaneous tissue. In three studies, ventrogluteal site did not significantly reduce the risk of subcutaneous injection (OR 0,62, 95% CI = 0.16, 2.41).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roldán-Chicano, M. T., Rodríguez-Tello, J., Cebrián-López, R., Moore, J. R., & del Mar García-López, M. (2023, September 1). Adverse effects of dorsogluteal intramuscular injection versus ventrogluteal intramuscular injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Open. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1902

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free