Contribution of Sonoelastography to Diagnosis in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of strain index measurements and a 5-point scoring method to diagnostic accuracy in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast masses and to compare the diagnostic performances of both methods. Methods: Eighty female patients were included in this study. Before biopsy, all patients underwent ultrasound (US) and sonoelastographic examinations. The elastographic images of lesions were assessed according to the 5-point scoring method, and then elasticity scores were determined. Strain values of the masses and subcutaneous adipose tissue were measured. The diagnostic efficacies of B-mode US, sonoelastographic 5-point scoring, and strain index methods were compared with histopathologic findings. Results: The mean age of the patients ± SD was 42 ± 13 years (range, 14–81 years). In histopathologic evaluations, 59 (74%) lesions were diagnosed as benign, and 21 (26%) were diagnosed as malignant. The mean strain index values were 10.45 ± 7.04 (range, 3.4–25.1) in malignant lesions and 2.88 ± 2.5 (range, 0.5–19.81) in benign lesions. The mean strain index for malignant lesions was significantly higher than that for benign lesions (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yıldız, M. S., Goya, C., & Adin, M. E. (2020). Contribution of Sonoelastography to Diagnosis in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Breast Masses. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 39(7), 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free