Integrated selection criteria in sugarcane breeding programs using discriminant function analysis

  • Abu-Ellail F
  • Hussein E
  • El-Bakry A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Selection indices help the plant breeders to discriminate desirable genotypes on the basis of phenotypic performance. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate thirty sugarcane genotypes (clones) along with two check cultivars in two cropping seasons at Mattana Agricultural Research Station. The results showed the studied traits observed in all genotypes were significantly different. The results could significantly discriminate between low and high sugar yield genotypes by describing eleven traits including sugar yield (ton/fed), cane yield (ton/fed), number of stalk/m2, stalk weight (kg), stalk height (cm), stalk diameter (cm), number of internodes, Brix %, sucrose %, purity %, and sugar recovery %. High sugar yield genotypes were selected by discriminant analysis. The discriminant score (DS) could explain 79.2% of sugar yield variations and had a significant canonical correlation (0.89**). Results of discriminant function analysis (DFA) indicated that the most important traits, in order of appearance, are stalk weight, stalk height, purity %, Brix%, and cane yields. Genotypes, G.2017-43, G.2017-42, G.2017-29, G.2017-33, and G.2017-44, showed the highest values of the discriminant score and were recognized as the highest yielder sugarcane genotypes. While the genotypes named Vis, G.2017-30, G.2017-10, G.2017-27, G.2017-25, G.2017-70, G.2017-41, G.2017-40, G.2017-35, and G.2017-58, recognized as the lowest yielder sugarcane genotypes which represent the lowest values of the discriminant score.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu-Ellail, F. F. B., Hussein, E. M. A., & El-Bakry, A. (2020). Integrated selection criteria in sugarcane breeding programs using discriminant function analysis. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00417-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free