Starting the clock: Defining nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury by time

17Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus when the designation of nonoperative management (NOM) for splenic injury (BSI) should start. We evaluated NOM success rates based on different time points after admission. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was evaluated for BSI for the year 2008. Observations were evaluated by facility, the time to splenectomy, and the volume of BSI admissions. Results: Of 15,732 BSIs identified, the overall splenectomy salvage rate was 81%. After the 5th hour, the NOM success rate was 95%. Multivariable analysis revealed that higher BSI grades, level 2 centers and community hospitals, and age ≥55 were associated with failed NOM. Conclusions: The grade of injury is an important predictor for failure of NOM. If a 5% failure rate is to be considered a benchmark, then the 5-hour time point after admission should be used for the calculation of NOM success rates. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeremitsky, E., Smith, R. S., & Ong, A. W. (2013). Starting the clock: Defining nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury by time. American Journal of Surgery, 205(3), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free