The effect of loading time on marginal bone change of implants immediately placed after extraction: a retrospective study

  • Lee S
  • Kim E
  • Lee D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the treatment outcomes between two groups which are both immediately placed implant cases, one is immediate loading, and the other is conventional loading group. METHODS: Medical records of the patients who underwent implant treatment which were immediately placed after tooth extraction were analyzed. Demographic data were collected and by using periapical or panoramic radiographic image, marginal bone level and distant crestal bone level were measured. Marginal bone change over time was analyzed and compared between immediate loading group and conventional loading group. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients, 112 immediately placed implants after tooth extraction were initially involved. Measuring was done with implants which had not failed (81). 10 implants were had failed and removed. The others were excluded because of follow-up loss, absence of radiographic image, etc. Demographic data were collected, and measured values were averaged at each follow-up and showed in linear graphs. CONCLUSIONS: In case of immediate implantation of dental implant after extraction, loading time could affect marginal bone level or biological width of the implant. Immediate loading group showed 0.92 mm (mean value) more bone loss compared to conventional loading group at bone-implant contact points 24 months after implantation. At distant crestal points, there was no noticeable difference in bone change pattern between two groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S.-J., Kim, E.-H., Lee, D.-K., Song, I.-S., & Jun, S.-H. (2022). The effect of loading time on marginal bone change of implants immediately placed after extraction: a retrospective study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00442-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free