Comparative Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Assay and Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay for the Screening of Hepatitis C

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The primary objective of the study was to identify a highly sensitive and specific screening technique for the detection of Hepatitis C infection in healthy blood donors in a low prevalence area for HCV. In this study, two of the most commonly used methods for Anti-HCV screening, i.e., Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) and Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) were performed among 517 selected healthy blood donors. The clinical performance of ECLIA and CMIA was compared on the basis of their operational variables, i.e., Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Youden’s J index, Positive and Negative predictive values and False discovery, False positive and False negative rate, etc., Both ECLIA and CMIA are highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) in terms of anti HCV detection among the blood donors. According to the clinical performance of ECLIA and CMIA, both are efficient in detecting anti-HCV antibodies among the asymptomatic population of healthy blood donors. But as both of them are associated with false positive results, it is recommended to have Polymerase chain reaction on the reactive samples to detect the HCV RNA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wadood, M., & Usman, M. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Assay and Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay for the Screening of Hepatitis C. Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 35(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0968-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free