Micra leadless pacemaker for bridge use after explantation of infected permanent pacemaker system: A case report

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The extraction of a pacemaker (PM) lead may cause tricuspid regurgitation; however, in cases of device infection, surgical intervention or immediate PM system replacement is undesirable in the short term to prevent reinfection. We describe a case where Micra leadless PM was used as a bridge procedure to ensure an adequate period for antibacterial therapy and later replaced with a permanent PM system in the setting of PM pocket infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Narita, M., Kunioka, S., Shirasaka, T., & Kamiya, H. (2021). Micra leadless pacemaker for bridge use after explantation of infected permanent pacemaker system: A case report. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2021(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free