Abstract
The extraction of a pacemaker (PM) lead may cause tricuspid regurgitation; however, in cases of device infection, surgical intervention or immediate PM system replacement is undesirable in the short term to prevent reinfection. We describe a case where Micra leadless PM was used as a bridge procedure to ensure an adequate period for antibacterial therapy and later replaced with a permanent PM system in the setting of PM pocket infection.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Narita, M., Kunioka, S., Shirasaka, T., & Kamiya, H. (2021). Micra leadless pacemaker for bridge use after explantation of infected permanent pacemaker system: A case report. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2021(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab094
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.