Abstract
Precarisation means more than insecure jobs, more than the lack of security given by waged employment. By way of insecurity and danger it embraces the whole of existence, the body, modes of subjectivation. It is threat and coercion, even while it opens up new possibilities of living and working. Precarisation means living with the unforeseeable, with contingency. In this article I analyse how the new precarious living and working conditions and the privatisation of protection against precariousness are conditions of both a prospering financial capitalism and its concomitant debt economy. This economy is based on the expansion of productivity that involves less work, in the traditional sense, than subjectivation. A new subjectivity is needed to assume responsibility, to take on debt, and to internalise the risks both as guilt and as debt: a personality that is doubly indebted and responsible for oneself.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lorey, I. (2019). Preserving precariousness, queering debt. Recerca, 24(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2019.24.1.8
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.