Flogisto versus oxígeno: Una nueva reconstrucción y su fundamentación histórica

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this work we develop structuralist reconstructions of phlogiston theory, by Priestley, and oxygen theory, by Lavoisier. Our proposal is an alternative to that offered by Caamaño (2009 and 2011) in an attempt to adjust better to the actual historical formulations of these theories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Falguera, J. L., & De Donato-Rodríguez, X. (2016). Flogisto versus oxígeno: Una nueva reconstrucción y su fundamentación histórica. Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, 48(142), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2016.237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free