Comparison of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for the selective detection of viable Legionella cells

72Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ethidium monoazide (EMA) and propidium monoazide (PMA) have been utilized for selective PCR amplification of DNA from viable bacterial cells. In this study, we compared the abilities of EMA and PMA, together with real-time PCR, to specifically distinguish dead Legionella cells from viable cells. Several experiments showed that PMA or EMA treatment could specifically prevent the PCR amplification of DNA from dead Legionella cells in water samples. However, a 4-fold higher concentration of PMA than EMA was required to achieve this effect. EMA may therefore be more useful for practical environmental investigations of Legionella.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, B., Taguri, T., Sugiyama, K., Amemura-Maekawa, J., Kura, F., & Watanabe, H. (2010). Comparison of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for the selective detection of viable Legionella cells. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 63(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.63.119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free