Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Outcome

  • Kodelja Z
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The report on the findings of extensive empirical research on equality of educational opportunities carried out in the US on a very large sample of public schools by Coleman and his colleagues has had a major impact on education policy and has given rise to a large amount of research and various interpretations. However, as some interpreters have highlighted,even more important than the findings of the survey themselves has been Coleman’s redefinition of equality of opportunity, abandoning the then prevailing conception of equality of educational opportunities as equality of starting points and replacing it with the concept of equality of educational opportunities as equality of educational outcomes. The question is, therefore, whether equality of outcomes really is one of the two types of equality of opportunity. The purpose of the present article is to show that equality of opportunity and equality of outcomes are two different types of equality. If they are different, the interpretation that Coleman has redefined the concept of “equality of educational opportunity” turns out to be incorrect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kodelja, Z. (2016). Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Outcome. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.85

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free