The Emergence and Development of Animal Research Ethics: A Review with a Focus on Nonhuman Primates

25Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The ethics of using nonhuman animals in biomedical research is usually seen as a subfield of animal ethics. In recent years, however, the ethics of animal research has increasingly become a subfield within research ethics under the term “animal research ethics”. Consequently, ethical issues have become prominent that are familiar in the context of human research ethics, such as autonomy or self-determination, harms and benefits, justice, and vulnerability. After a brief overview of the development of the field and a discussion of relevant theoretical ethical frameworks, I consider two of these issues, namely autonomy and self-determination on the one hand, and harms and benefits on the other hand. My concern is with philosophical and ethical issues, rather than animal research oversight. I focus my discussion on nonhuman primates, as the most plausible nonhuman candidates for this approach. I conclude that the approach, although promising, depends strongly on the moral status of nonhuman research subjects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnason, G. (2020). The Emergence and Development of Animal Research Ethics: A Review with a Focus on Nonhuman Primates. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2277–2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00219-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free