Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy

56Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine/morphine with those of tramadol/midazolam in patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary calculi. Methods: Sixty patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine 1 μg·kg-1 iv followed by 0.5 μg·kg-1·hr-1 infusion together with morphine patient-controlled analgesia [(PCA); 2 mg bolus, five minutes lockout, 2 mg·hr-1 infusion; (Group DEX)], or tramadol 1.5 mg·kg-1 pre-mixed with midazolam 30 μg·kg-1 iv followed by tramadol PCA [20 mg bolus, five minute lockout, 20 mg·hr-1 infusion; (Group TRA ]. Pain was assessed at baseline and every 15 min thereafter. Patients' and urologist's satisfaction with analgesia and sedation were determined on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied). Patient's discharge time was also documented. Results: Visual analogue scale scores over time were consistently lower in Group DEX compared with Group TRA (P = 0.001). Patients' satisfaction with analgesia (5 ± 1 vs 4 ± 2, P = 0.012) and with sedation (6 ± 1 vs 5 ± 1, P = 0.020), and urologist's satisfaction (6 ± 1 vs 4 ± 2, P = 0.001) were all higher amongst Group DEX patients compared with Group TRA. There was no difference between discharge times of patients in Group DEX compared with those in Group TRA [85 (60,115) min vs 65 (40,95) min, P = 0.069]. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provided better analgesia for ESWL and was associated with higher patients' and urologist's satisfaction when compared with a tramadol/midazolam PCA combination.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alhashemi, J. A., & Kaki, A. M. (2004). Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 51(4), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free