Postoperative complications followed by septoplasty comparison between conventional nasal packing and glove finger pack

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Objective of this study is to compare complications in postseptoplasty patients using conventional nasal packing and glove finger packing. Materials and methods: In our study 95 patients who underwent septoplasty were enrolled and written consent taken for the study among these 95 patients, 50 patients were put in group A and 45 patients in group B. In group A patients glove finger packing was done and in group B patients conventional packing using medicated gauze was done and postoperative complications like postoperative pain, hemorrhage, septal perforation, toxic shock syndrome, septal hematoma, septal deviation and synechia/adhesion bands were compared between two groups, follow-up was done for both groups for 3 weeks. Result: Our study showed that their was significantly less pain in group A patients and also their was less incidence of synechia in group A patients as compared to group B patients, their was not much difference in other complications. Conclusion: Our results point out that glove finger pack has more advantage than conventional medicated gauze pack. We recommend use of glove finger pack after septoplasty procedure. © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beigh, Z., Yousuf, A., Malik, M. A., & Ahmad, R. (2012). Postoperative complications followed by septoplasty comparison between conventional nasal packing and glove finger pack. Clinical Rhinology, 5(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free