Evaluation of liquefaction resistance in chemically grouted sand using cyclic triaxial tests

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Liquefaction induced by earthquakes poses a significant threat to infrastructure, particularly in loose sandy soils. Chemical grouting is a widely used countermeasure to enhance soil stability; however, its effectiveness under dynamic loading lacks standardized quantitative evaluation methods. This study evaluates the liquefaction resistance of chemically grouted sand using stress-controlled and strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests. Specimens treated with colloidal silica at concentrations of 6 %, 8 %, and 10 % were tested under undrained conditions with an effective confining pressure of 100 kPa and a loading frequency of 0.1 Hz. The strain-controlled method, applying a constant double-amplitude axial strain, was introduced as an alternative to mitigate tensile failure (necking) observed in stress-controlled tests. Liquefaction resistance was assessed using excess pore water pressure, axial strain criteria, and cumulative dissipated energy as a unified evaluation index. Results showed that higher silica concentrations significantly improved liquefaction resistance, with the 10 % concentration providing the greatest cyclic strength. Strain-controlled tests demonstrated greater consistency and avoided premature tensile failure, while cumulative dissipated energy correlated strongly with liquefaction resistance across both methods. These findings suggest that strain-controlled cyclic triaxial testing is a reliable alternative for evaluating liquefaction resistance in chemically treated soils and support its integration into performance-based geotechnical design frameworks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyaw, K. N. C., Motohashi, T., Sasahara, S., & Inazumi, S. (2025). Evaluation of liquefaction resistance in chemically grouted sand using cyclic triaxial tests. Results in Engineering, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106875

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free