Clinical outcomes of a modified ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free implantable collamer lens implantation

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a modified dual-incision ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free (OVD-free) method for implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation in high myopic eyes. Methods: A total of 68 participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized clinical trial, including 33 in the OVD-free group and 35 in the standard group. Operation time and intraocular pressure (IOP) at 2 hours postoperatively were recorded. Visual acuity, refractive power, IOP, corneal endothelium parameters, and anterior segment parameters were assessed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative subjective visual quality at 3 months was recorded through a Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Results: No significant differences in visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and corneal endothelial parameters were found, while the operation time was significantly shorter in the OVD-free group. Both groups showed a significant increase in IOP at 2 hours after surgery, but the increase in the OVD-free group was significantly smaller than that in the standard group. In addition, the frequency of ring-shaped dysphotopsia in the OVD-free group (15.15%) was significantly lower than that in the standard group (40%), and the severity and annoyance of this symptom were also significantly lower in the OVD-free group. Conclusion: The modified OVD-free ICL implantation is a safe, effective, and predictable method for myopia correction, which could be a better choice for short surgery time, better subjective visual perception, and low occurrence of IOP elevation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C., Yu, Q., Zhou, Q., Li, F., & Zhou, J. (2024). Clinical outcomes of a modified ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free implantable collamer lens implantation. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 72(9), 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2859_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free