Impact of type of vascular access on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients transitioning to haemodialysis: an ANZDATA study

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Type of vascular access used for haemodialysis is associated with long-term outcomes. However, the effect of access on haemodialysis transfer for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has not been fully explored. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in incident adult PD patients from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry who transferred to haemodialysis between 2004 and 2022. Associations between vascular access on transfer [central venous catheter (CVC) or arterio-venous access (AVA)] and clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, kidney transplantation and return to PD) were compared using Cox proportional hazards analysis and competing risk models. Results: Of 6824 patients, 65% used a CVC on transfer and 35% an AVA. Variability of access type at transfer between centres was high (range 13%-98% for CVC). AVA transfer was associated with a longer PD vintage (1.6 versus 1.2 years, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheikh Hassan, H. I., Murali, K., Chen, J. H. C., & Mullan, J. (2025). Impact of type of vascular access on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients transitioning to haemodialysis: an ANZDATA study. Clinical Kidney Journal, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free