Abstract
Accurate estimation of lithium-ion battery (LIB) state of health (SOH) underpins safe operation, predictive maintenance, and lifetime-aware energy management. Despite recent advances in machine learning (ML), systematic benchmarking across heterogeneous real-world cells remains limited, often confounded by data leakage and inconsistent validation. Here, we establish a leakage-averse, cross-battery evaluation framework encompassing 32 commercial LIBs (B5–B56) spanning diverse cycling histories and temperatures (≈4 °C, 24 °C, 43 °C). Models ranging from classical regressors to ensemble trees and deep sequence architectures were assessed under blocked 5-fold GroupKFold splits using RMSE, MAE, R2 with confidence intervals, and inference latency. The results reveal distinct stratification among model families. Sequence-based architectures—CNN–LSTM, GRU, and LSTM—consistently achieved the highest accuracy (mean RMSE ≈ 0.006; per-cell R2 up to 0.996), demonstrating strong generalization across regimes. Gradient-boosted ensembles such as LightGBM and CatBoost delivered competitive mid-tier accuracy (RMSE ≈ 0.012–0.015) yet unrivaled computational efficiency (≈0.001–0.003 ms), confirming their suitability for embedded applications. Transformer-based hybrids underperformed, while approximately one-third of cells exhibited elevated errors linked to noise or regime shifts, underscoring the necessity of rigorous evaluation design. Collectively, these findings establish clear deployment guidelines: CNN–LSTM and GRU are recommended where robustness and accuracy are paramount (cloud and edge analytics), while LightGBM and CatBoost offer optimal latency–efficiency trade-offs for embedded controllers. Beyond model choice, the study highlights data curation and leakage-averse validation as critical enablers for transferable and reliable SOH estimation. This benchmarking framework provides a robust foundation for future integration of ML models into real-world battery management systems.
Author supplied keywords
- battery management systems (BMS)
- cross-battery benchmarking
- end-of-life prediction (EOL)
- gradient boosting (LightGBM, CatBoost)
- interpretability (SHAP, permutation importance)
- lithium-ion battery
- sequence models (CNN–LSTM, GRU, LSTM)
- state of health (SOH)
- temperature effects
- uncertainty calibration (ECE, MCE)
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Madani, S. S., Hébert, M., Boulon, L., Lupien-Bédard, A., & Allard, F. (2025). Comparative Analysis of ML and DL Models for Data-Driven SOH Estimation of LIBs Under Diverse Temperature and Load Conditions. Batteries, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11110393
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.