Comparative Analysis of ML and DL Models for Data-Driven SOH Estimation of LIBs Under Diverse Temperature and Load Conditions

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Accurate estimation of lithium-ion battery (LIB) state of health (SOH) underpins safe operation, predictive maintenance, and lifetime-aware energy management. Despite recent advances in machine learning (ML), systematic benchmarking across heterogeneous real-world cells remains limited, often confounded by data leakage and inconsistent validation. Here, we establish a leakage-averse, cross-battery evaluation framework encompassing 32 commercial LIBs (B5–B56) spanning diverse cycling histories and temperatures (≈4 °C, 24 °C, 43 °C). Models ranging from classical regressors to ensemble trees and deep sequence architectures were assessed under blocked 5-fold GroupKFold splits using RMSE, MAE, R2 with confidence intervals, and inference latency. The results reveal distinct stratification among model families. Sequence-based architectures—CNN–LSTM, GRU, and LSTM—consistently achieved the highest accuracy (mean RMSE ≈ 0.006; per-cell R2 up to 0.996), demonstrating strong generalization across regimes. Gradient-boosted ensembles such as LightGBM and CatBoost delivered competitive mid-tier accuracy (RMSE ≈ 0.012–0.015) yet unrivaled computational efficiency (≈0.001–0.003 ms), confirming their suitability for embedded applications. Transformer-based hybrids underperformed, while approximately one-third of cells exhibited elevated errors linked to noise or regime shifts, underscoring the necessity of rigorous evaluation design. Collectively, these findings establish clear deployment guidelines: CNN–LSTM and GRU are recommended where robustness and accuracy are paramount (cloud and edge analytics), while LightGBM and CatBoost offer optimal latency–efficiency trade-offs for embedded controllers. Beyond model choice, the study highlights data curation and leakage-averse validation as critical enablers for transferable and reliable SOH estimation. This benchmarking framework provides a robust foundation for future integration of ML models into real-world battery management systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madani, S. S., Hébert, M., Boulon, L., Lupien-Bédard, A., & Allard, F. (2025). Comparative Analysis of ML and DL Models for Data-Driven SOH Estimation of LIBs Under Diverse Temperature and Load Conditions. Batteries, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11110393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free