Haldane's rule: Genetic bases and their empirical support

68Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are few patterns in evolution that are as rigidly held as Haldane's rule (HR), which states, "When in the first generation between hybrids between 2 species, 1 sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is always the heterogametic sex." Yet despite considerable attention for almost a century, questions persist as to how many independent examples exist and what is (are) the underlying genetic cause(s). Here, we review recent evidence extending HR to plants, where previously it has only been documented in animals. We also discuss recent comparative analyses that show much more variation in sex-chromosome composition than previously recognized, thus increasing the number of potential independent origins of HR dramatically. Finally, we review the standing of genetic theories proposed to explain HR in light of the new examples and new molecular understanding.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Delph, L. F., & Demuth, J. P. (2016, September 1). Haldane’s rule: Genetic bases and their empirical support. Journal of Heredity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esw026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free