Different Roles for Simple-Cell and Complex-Cell Inhibition in V1

77Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previously, we proposed a model of the circuitry underlying simple-cell responses in cat primary visual cortex (V1) layer 4. We argued that the ordered arrangement of lateral geniculate nucleus inputs to a simple cell must be supplemented by a component of feedforward inhibition that is untuned for orientation and responds to high temporal frequencies to explain the sharp contrast-invariant orientation tuning and low-pass temporal frequency tuning of simple cells. The temporal tuning also requires a significant NMDA component in geniculocortical synapses. Recent experiments have revealed cat V1 layer 4 inhibitory neurons with two distinct types of receptive fields (RFs): complex RFs with mixed ON/OFF responses lacking in orientation tuning, and simple RFs with normal, sharp-orientation tuning (although, some respond to all orientations). We show that complex inhibitory neurons can provide the inhibition needed to explain simple-cell response properties. Given this complex cell inhibition, antiphase or "push-pull" inhibition from tuned simple inhibitory neurons acts to sharpen spatial frequency tuning, lower responses to low temporal frequency stimuli, and increase the stability of cortical activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lauritzen, T. Z., & Miller, K. D. (2003). Different Roles for Simple-Cell and Complex-Cell Inhibition in V1. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(32), 10201–10213. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-32-10201.2003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free